?????
Creative Commons License photo credit: QiFei

Over the past day or so, a blog post posted on Google’s blog rocked the internet & the world. In it, Google gave it’s position on China relating to a systematic attack on known Chinese human right’s activists:-

“we have discovered that the accounts of dozens of U.S.-, China- and Europe-based Gmail users who are advocates of human rights in China appear to have been routinely accessed by third parties.”

Whilst it doesn’t point the finger at shady authorities directly, some of the language used (phrases such as “targetted attacked” thinly covered with “phishing scams & malware”) is contradictory enough to suggest Google knows damn well who caused the issue, and that group of  people are high in China’s government.

Google fought with it’s most powerful weapon – information – and simply stated that it was reviewing it’s feasability on how to conduct business in Google. A very diplomatic way to say that what has happened is bang out of order, and like any other business, if you treat any service, employee or user with abuse, the service is going to be withdrawn.

I’d love to believe that it was a moral move, but the cynic in me knows that with Google as the prime conduit for information exchange, it stands to profit greatly from as much information freely available as possible.

Nevertheless the news was met with trepidation in Wall St.: Google’s share price dropped around 1.1% with the news (source), which is odd, considering that when they announced that they were censoring the content in China in early 2006, nearly 15% was wiped off the company. From a financial standpoint, it appears that Google are damned if you do, damned if you don’t.

This leads me to believe that maybe this move was driven at the very least on protecting it’s property (Google doesn’t want to be seen to have leaky services),but more than likely on Google’s “Do No Evil” mantra. China went from just being naughty in Google’s eyes, to evil, and Google – who hoped that the human rights record in China was to improve – has given up helping.

Ironically Google’s withdrawl from China could be the one thing that brings about human right’s change, particularly if more western countries follow their lead. China is an expanding market, but Google are saying that it’s not worth exploiting at the expense of current markets, company morals & ethics.

The move could be a great move financially, as at the beginning of the recession, one phrase that was bounded around a lot was “Ethical Economies”, and how some respected financial analysts belived that a new form of capitalism where growth was achieved outside of exploitation would lift us out of recession. I’m not sure totally about that, but if Google are trying, then by god good on them.

Tags: , | Comments: 6 Comments

 
 

6 Comments

  1. Kaylee says:

    My accounting teacher would love this; she’s always talking about Corporate Social Responsibility.

    I think it’s a good move on Google’s part, even if they have ulterior motives, and won’t hurt them in the long-run. The 1% drop isn’t worrying; I’m sure investors get jumpy when there’s any sort of news that isn’t clearly positive… And 1% is not much compared to the 15% drop when they censored their content!

  2. Rod Macbeth says:

    This is a good thing in my view. It’s about time some of these large corporations starting thinking about more then the almighty dollar.

    Bravo, Google.

  3. Young says:

    Google just find a way to withdraw from China.

  4. Mike Perry says:

    I’m sure you are right, Google know exactly where the problem lies but are unlikely to point the finger.

    A while back I had a problem with comments from China on one of my blogs. I had mentioned China and human rights in the same sentence. The post pulled in 4000+ hits in one day and hundreds of comments from, what I presumed to be, Chinese people. Google immediately hit my search engine placing and my regular 100-200 daily Google referrals vanished to nil.

    Google has it’s own form of censorship and not just for China.

    Interesting post,
    Mike.

  5. No matter what Google PR says, it’s all about the money. They can say what they want, but the fact is that they are in second place in China despite the fact that they are spending tons of money there. This whole thing is just a means for Google to pull out gracefully while getting some free press at the same time. I don’t care what anybody says, Google is still a publicly traded company that has to answer to their shareholders.

  6. Julie Joyce says:

    Great post! While I cannot agree completely with your thoughts, I will be back for more!! Please visit my site at http://www.arseclowns.com for more tips on how to threaten to withdraw from China.





Subscribe to the comments on this post | Trackback URL

 
  • MaxBlogPress Ninja Affiliate
About Rhys

Rhys Wynne, the author of this blog, is a 20 something web designer from Colwyn Bay. Go to my favourite posts

Find out More

On Social Networks

Facebook Twitter Youtube Facebook Fan Page Linked In StumbleUpon Digg Delicious Myspace last.fm dopplr Problogger Blog Engage Problogger

Facebook
Twitter
Youtube
Facebook Fan Page
Digg
Delicious
Myspace
last.fm
Dopplr
StumbleUpon
Problogger.com Forums
Playfire
Blog Engage
Linked In

 

Sponsors